Question

I was trying to separate my DAL from my Business Layer, and in doing so, I decided to eschew any ActiveRecord approach and go for a DataMapper approach.
In other words, my domain objects would not take care of persisting themselves. In doing so, I seem to be encroaching on the “anemic domain model” anti-pattern. For instance, one of the entities in my program is an Organization.

An organization is represented as something like this:

class Organization {
    private $orgId;
    private $orgName;

    // getters and setters
}

So basically this organization does nothing other than act as “bag” (as Martin Fowler says) for some data. In the PHP world it is nothing more than a glorified array. There is zero behaviour associated with it.

And behaviour in the program, I’ve been sticking in “service level” class like an OrganizationService which mostly serves as an intermediary between these objects and the DAL.

Other than potential scaling issues with PHP (I do have other reasons why I insist on “bagging” my data in these objects), is this approach totally off?

How do you handle your domain models in these situations?
Perhaps an organization isn’t part of my domain in the first place?

Answer 1

well, it seems like this at the beginning, but when you’ll refactor your code more, you’ll get to some behavior for your organization class…

one example that i might think of now is if you have people (employees), you may want to associate them with organization. so, you might have a method AssociateEmployee(User employee) that might find its place in your organization class.

Or you might change location of the company, instead of setting parameters like address, city, state in three steps, you might add ChangeLocation(Street, City, State) method..

Just go step by step, when you encounter some code in you BL/service layer that seems like it should belong into the domain, move it down to the domain. If you read Fowler, you will get it very soon when you see it in your code.