Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8773153
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T18:13:19+00:00 2026-06-13T18:13:19+00:00

I was trying to use -dumpversion to determine if the compiler is usable. My

  • 0

I was trying to use -dumpversion to determine if the compiler is usable.
My project compiles with clang and newer gccs, but not with the old gcc 4.2.1.

So why does clang pretend to be an old gcc?

Extra questions, is it possible to change this value at runtime?

Or does anyone have a nice autoconf macro to determine the compiler version with both clang and gcc?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T18:13:20+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 6:13 pm

    Clang was originally written to be compatible with gcc 4.2.1. There has been some discussion about updating that number earlier this year, but there were issues.

    For autoconf checking, clang suggests to use its __has_feature extension. Clang’s document has a list of things you can check with __has_feature too.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Trying to use the RHEL5.3 GCC 4.3.2 compiler to build my software on that
Trying to use Java's regexp I want to match /app, /app/.* , but not
I am trying use filehelpers class builder but I am kinda confused on what
Trying to use Net::SFTP, version 2.05 (appears to be the latest). But it fails
I was trying use svn to find a checkin using svn log, but it
I am trying use std::copy to copy from two different iterator. But during course
I'm trying use the Sum method in a lambda expression for a comparison, but
I am trying use cursor for pagination. Forwarding pagination work fine, but I can
I work with Microchip PIC microcontrollers. I'm trying use clang for autocompletion in Vim.
I am trying use Thread but i have some problem (I am beginner at

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.