Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 585185
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:58:35+00:00 2026-05-13T14:58:35+00:00

I was under the impression that all updates to a SQL server database are

  • 0

I was under the impression that all updates to a SQL server database are first added the T-Log before being applied to the underlying database. In the event of the server crashing, the restore process would rollback any uncommitted transactions. This I also assumed works with transactions, if a commit or rollback is not called the changes will not be made.

So I wanted to see the reaction of SQL server to transactions being cut short. i.e. transactional updates without a commit or rollback. What I found I don’t quite understand. Especially, how SQL server can allow this to happen.

I used the script below to insert rows into a table with a delay to give me enough time to stop the transaction before it reaches the commit or rollback. This I guess would simulate the client application timing out before the transaction completed.

    Create Table MyTest (Comment varchar(20))
Go
Create Procedure MyProc 

as

Begin Try
    Begin Transaction

        Insert Into MyTest Select 'My First Entry'

        WaitFor Delay '00:00:02'

        Insert Into MyTest Select 'My Second Entry'

        WaitFor Delay '00:00:02'

        Insert Into MyTest Select 'My Third Entry'

    Commit Transaction

    Return 0 -- success
End Try

Begin Catch
    If (@@trancount<>0) Rollback Transaction

    Declare @err int, @err_msg varchar(max)
    Select @err = error_number(), @err_msg = error_message()
    Raiserror(@err_msg, 16,1)

    Return @err
End Catch

If you run the script, depending on how quickly you stop the procedure, you will see that the first one or two inserts will remain in the table. Could someone explain why this would happen?

Select * From MyTest

I tested this on SQL 2008.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:58:36+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:58 pm

    Correct, TXNs are written using “Write Ahead Logging”. There are MSDB articles about it and how this interacts with commit/rollback/checkpoints etc

    However, a command timout (or what you are doing simply stops code executing) and the TXN is never rolled back and locks released until the connection is closed (or done later separately). This is what SET XACT_ABORT is for

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 369k
  • Answers 369k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The cache does just that, it caches whatever you put… May 14, 2026 at 6:18 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Users are usually treated as plural, not singular. If you… May 14, 2026 at 6:18 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer First you need a recursive listing of both directories. A… May 14, 2026 at 6:18 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.