Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I was wondering if anyone knew the thinking behind there decision to do this:
Alot of pages on Apple.com have clean links such as:
however some of there pages end with .html
http://www.apple.com/airportexpress/features/airtunes.html
I find it unlikely that these pages are static html pages so….
Why would Apple (and other sites) do with, what are the usability advantages?
After a some thought, the way I see it is the ‘.html’ signify to the user that there is no more pages down that branch of the site. Anything that ends with ‘/’ has a menu on it and the user can go a little deeper.