Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8828919
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T07:42:58+00:00 2026-06-14T07:42:58+00:00

I was wondering if it is possible, access a byte[] with an offset without

  • 0

I was wondering if it is possible, access a byte[] with an offset without having to copy data around?
I’ve looked at Arrays.*, ByteArrayInputStream and System.arraycopy, but they all require to allocate a new byte[] to copy to.

What I want is an equivalent to this in C++:

char* buffer = new char[256];
char* buf_offset = buffer + 128; // <- no copy
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T07:42:59+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 7:42 am

    You can pass ByteBuffer around instead. It can be advanced, duplicated, sliced without copying.

    ByteBuffer is really ugly and counter-intuitive. However it’s being used extensively in new JDK APIs, so one can probably accept that it’s a basic type.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just wondering if it is possible to access the Mac OS X Address Book
I was wondering if it possible to access iPhone User Music, Videos, Photos and
is it possible to access the InfoMessage event handler in a Linq2SQL data context?
I'm wondering if it's possible to access all of the userdata tables (is it
I was wondering if it is possible to access a memory mapped file (c#,
I'm wondering if it's possible to access page JavaScript variables with Selenium. I have
I was wondering if it's possible to access the controller being executed (or about
I've successfully installed a joomla website and was wondering if it's possible to access
I was wondering if it was possible to access custom rules placed into a
I was wondering if it's possible to access the ASP.NET Configuration Tool once a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.