I was wondering if there is a better way to cope with MS-Access’ inability to handle NULL for boolean-values other than change the column-data-type to integer.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I was wondering if there is a better way to cope with MS-Access’ inability to handle NULL for boolean-values other than change the column-data-type to integer.
I think you must use a number, and so, it seems does Allen Browne, Access MVP.