Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I was wondering if there is some compiler parameter, preferably in gcc (g++) which treats the lack of try/catch blocks as errors. This is the standard behavior in java and I was alway fond of it.
Since checked exceptions in Java rely on the
throwsignature, you can read why you will not want to usethrowfunction signatures in C++ in this question on SO.