Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7864597
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T23:50:00+00:00 2026-06-02T23:50:00+00:00

I was wondering if there was a shorter way to write if (test !=

  • 0

I was wondering if there was a shorter way to write

if (test != 'e' || test != 'd')

I want to write it like

if (test != ('e' || 'd'))

Or something like this so i don’t have to repeat “test !=”

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T23:50:01+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 11:50 pm

    That’s the syntax of the language. There’s not much you can do about it… If you don’t like the way it looks, you can make a boolean function that contains the tests and then just call that function:

    bool isEOrD(char test)
    {
        return (test != 'e' || test != 'd')
    }
    
    ...
    
    if (isEOrD(test)) 
    

    EDIT: There are other ways to write this code (see the comments to this answer), but your original way is probably the cleanest approach.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm wondering if there's a shorter way to write this: var x = 1;
I was wondering if there was a way to do something like this in
I'm wondering if there's a simpler way to do this: Position something centre-screen horizontally
I was just wondering if there is a shortcut to do something like this
I was wondering if there is a shorter way of writing the following code:
I'm wondering if there is a shorter way of inserting text in PHP than
Hello Python experts, I am wondering if there is any shorter way to assign
I was wondering if there is a shorter version for this: RewriteRule ^signup$ /signup.php
I was wondering if there is a shorter, better or cleaner way to assign
Wondering if there is any way to get the lambda expressions that result from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.