Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 543937
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:36:08+00:00 2026-05-13T10:36:08+00:00

I was wondering if this actually worked ? private void RegisterKeyChanged(T item) { item.OnKeyChanged

  • 0

I was wondering if this actually worked ?

private void RegisterKeyChanged(T item) 
{
    item.OnKeyChanged += (o, k) => ChangeItemKey((T)o, k);
}

private void UnRegisterKeyChanged(T item) 
{
    item.OnKeyChanged -= (o, k) => ChangeItemKey((T)o, k);
}

How does the compiler know that the event handlers are the same ? Is this even recommended?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:36:08+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:36 am

    There’s an MSDN page that talks about this:

    How to Subscribe to and Unsubscribe from Events

    Note in particular:

    If you will not have to unsubscribe to [sic]
    an event later, you can use the
    addition assignment operator (+=) to
    attach an anonymous method to the
    event.

    And also:

    It is important to notice that you
    cannot easily unsubscribe from an
    event if you used an anonymous
    function to subscribe to it. To
    unsubscribe in this scenario, it is
    necessary to go back to the code where
    you subscribe to the event, store the
    anonymous method in a delegate
    variable, and then add the delegate to
    the event . In general, we recommend
    that you do not use anonymous
    functions to subscribe to events if
    you will have to unsubscribe from
    the event at some later point in your
    code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was wondering what this statement actually does: $this->nameInObject = $someValue; So if you're
Premise This problem has a known solution (shown below actually), I'm just wondering if
Wondering if this is possible. We have an 3rd Party library that contains identification
Just wondering is this kind of code recommended to increase performance? void functionCalledLotsofTimes() {
I'm wondering if this is actually a bug in the Android API: I have
I'm wondering this because it's just dawned on me that I've never been involved
I've been wondering this for a while but since it hasn't come up much
I've been wondering this for some time. As the title say, which is faster,
I'm wondering if this is a good design. I have a number of tables
I'm wondering if this is possible in SQL. Say you have two tables A

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.