Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 78067
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T20:55:44+00:00 2026-05-10T20:55:44+00:00

I was wondering whether overriding conversion operators is only applicable to numeric types? If

  • 0

I was wondering whether overriding conversion operators is only applicable to numeric types? If not in what instances would the implicit or explicit conversion operator be applicable to other value types or reference types. An example would be great. Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T20:55:45+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 8:55 pm

    No – you can use any type.

    For example, XAttribute has a range of conversions defined that make various conversions simple:

        XAttribute attrib = new XAttribute('Foo', '12345');     int i = (int)attrib;     string s = (string)attrib; 

    Another useful example is Jon’s NonNullable<T> – this is intended to work neatly with classes while disallowing nulls. The conversion operators make it easy to use.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was wondering whether or not it is considered a good style to call
I was wondering whether the instant search using jQuery would cause a massive load
I was wondering whether Lua has any preemptive multitasking facilities built-in. I would like
I'm wondering whether anyone here has ever used a skip list . It looks
I've been wondering whether there is a good "git export" solution that creates a
I'm wondering whether something like this is possible (and relatively easy to do), and
I was wondering whether the object to test should be a field and thus
I was just wondering whether there is some way to do this: I have
I was wondering whether SVN actually compresses the binary content on the server during
I am new to git. I am wondering whether the following scenario is supported,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.