Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6973953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T17:10:28+00:00 2026-05-27T17:10:28+00:00

I was wondering which part of my code will free a dynamically allocated, but

  • 0

I was wondering which part of my code will free a dynamically allocated, but static class member when this is not needed anymore. See the following code: classPrinter is shared among all A-objects and created when the first instance of class A will be created. Just to be sure: the classPrinter-object will automatically be destructed when exiting my program, right?

a.h

class A {
static B* classPrinter;
}

a.cpp

#include "a.h"
B A::classPrinter = new B();

A::A() { ...}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T17:10:29+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 5:10 pm

    Just to be sure: the somePrinter-object will automatically be destructed when exiting my program, right?

    Since this is C++, the answer is “No.” For everything allocated with new the corresponding delete must be called. If that doesn’t happen, the object leaks. But why allocate this dynamically at all? This

    class A {
      static B classPrinter;
    }
    
    B A::classPrinter;
    

    behaves like your code, except that classPrinter will be destructed at the end of the program.

    However, you write that

    classPrinter is shared among all A-objects and created when the first instance of class A will be created.

    The code in your question doesn’t do this. If you want to do this, do something like this:

    class A {
      static std::shared_ptr<B> classPrinter;
    }
    
    std::shared_ptr<B> A::classPrinter;
    
    A::A()
    {
      if(!classPrinter)
        classPrinter.reset(new B());
    }
    

    The smart pointer will make sure that the object gets deleted.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm wondering what is the culturally-acceptable way to handle this code situation. I have
This question is similar to this one , but not a duplicate because I'm
Just wondering which is faster: DELETE FROM table_name WHERE X='1' DELETE FROM table_name WHERE
I was wondering which was better: $lookup = array( a => 1, b =>
I am wondering which is more efficient, to store temporary data (related to that
I was wondering which kind of expressiveness fits a language used to generate particle
I was wondering which DVCS is most conducive to experimentation i.e. branching, etc. I
I am wondering which way would end up being faster, selecting elements by: $('element[href=#my_link]');
I was wondering which tool in ORACLE 11g (their latest DBMS) can be used
I was wondering which of these two scenario's works best for swapping between 2

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.