Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3786670
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T11:43:11+00:00 2026-05-19T11:43:11+00:00

I wondering if there’s a way to not have to repeat the same if

  • 0

I wondering if there’s a way to not have to repeat the same if construction but rather call a StatusCheck(). It can’t return true when it succeeds. Anyone knows a better title for this question?

bool Enable()
{
    if (!GetStatus(ref status)) { Trace.WriteLine("Error"); return false; }
    // do stuff

    if (!GetStatus(ref status)) { Trace.WriteLine("Error"); return false; }
    // do more stuff

    if (!GetStatus(ref status)) { Trace.WriteLine("Error"); return false; }
    // do even more stuff

    // 6 more times the above

    return true;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T11:43:12+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 11:43 am

    You can create a CheckStatus() method that throws an exception if the status is not valid, then handle that exception in your Enable() method:

    public void CheckStatus(int status)
    {
        if (!IsValidStatus(status)) {
            throw new InvalidStatusException(status);
        }
    }
    
    public bool Enable()
    {
        try {
            CheckStatus(status);
            // do stuff
    
            CheckStatus(status);
            // do more stuff
    
            CheckStatus(status);
            // do even more stuff
    
            // 6 more times the above
    
            return true;
    
        } catch (InvalidStatusException) {
            Trace.WriteLine("Error");
            return false;
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just wondering is there any way I can check whether the url links to
Just wondering if there is a way you can attach a function while startDrag
Wondering if there is a way to have multicolor text for ASP.NET Button Text.
Wondering if there's any not-too-hard way to edit non-form text in html 4. I
wondering if there's any way to make it so that a list I have
Wondering if there is any way to get the lambda expressions that result from
Wondering if there is a good way to generate temporary URLs that expire in
Wondering if there are any well informed Linux gurus here who can answer a
Wondering if there is any tool that can help me to detect a pronoun's
just wondering if there is a way to reduce the amount of code needed

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.