I work for a .net shop looking to integrate a CI server. From what I’ve seen, Hudson seems to be the most popular choice. Considering we are a .net only shop, will Hudson present any hurdles that CC.NET will not?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I work for a .net shop looking to integrate a CI server. From what I’ve seen, Hudson seems to be the most popular choice. Considering we are a .net only shop, will Hudson present any hurdles that CC.NET will not?
I cant think of a single thing that Hudson hasnt been able to do for our C# development, even with MSTest based tests, you can now run and trendgraph on them with the new plugin (only works if you are testing ONE assembly) or my method which works on multiple assemblies.
I suppose the only thing that would be nice, would be to generate code coverage data and report on that, not sure if CC.net does that.
Also, Hudson seems to have much stronger community support. I’ve never heard of someone picking CC.net over Hudson if they had the choice.
We use it to
These things may not be anything new to Hudson, but I felt the need to re emphasize that Hudson can handle this with a .net project, no problem.
Here are some of the built in .net stuff that Hudson supports
Also, god forbid you are using visual source safe, it supports that as well. I’d recommend you take a look at Redsolo’s article on building .net projects using Hudson