Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6065777
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:25:43+00:00 2026-05-23T09:25:43+00:00

I working on some code in the linux kernel (2.4) and for some reason

  • 0

I working on some code in the linux kernel (2.4) and for some reason kmalloc returns the same address (I believe it only happens after the middle of the test). I checked that no calls to kfree were made between the calls to kmalloc (i.e memory is still in use).

maybe I’m out of memory ? (kmalloc didn’t return NULL…)

any ideas on how such a thing can happen ?

thanks in advance for the help!

code:

typedef struct
{
    char* buffer;
    int read_count;
    int write_count;
    struct semaphore read_sm;
    struct semaphore write_sm;
    int reader_ready;
    int writer_ready;
    int createTimeStamp;
} data_buffer_t ;

typedef struct vsf_t vsf_t;

struct vsf_t
{
    int minor;
    int type;
    int open_count;
    int waiting_pid;
    data_buffer_t* data;
    list_t proc_list;
    vsf_t* otherSide_vsf;
    int real_create_time_stamp;
};

int create_vsf(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, struct vsf_command_parameters* parms)
{
...
    buff_data = allocate_buffer();
    if (buff_data == NULL)
    {
        kfree(this_vsfRead);
        kfree(this_vsfWrite);
        return -ENOMEM;
    }
...
}

data_buffer_t* allocate_buffer()
{
...
    data_buffer_t* this_buff = (data_buffer_t*)kmalloc(sizeof(data_buffer_t), GFP_KERNEL);
    if (this_buff == NULL)
    {
        printk( KERN_WARNING "failure at allocating memory\n" );
        return NULL;
    }
...
return this_buff;
}

*I print after every kmalloc and kfree,I’m absolutely sure that no kfree is called between kmalloc’s (that return the same adress)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:25:44+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:25 am

    I don’t know what kmalloc’s data structures look like but you could imagine this happening if a previous double free caused a cycle in a linked list of buffers. Further frees could still chain on additional distinct buffers (able to be reallocated) but once those were exhausted that last buffer would be returned indefinitely.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working on some code to colorize an image in Java. Basically what I'd
I'm working on some code that uses the System.Diagnostics.Trace class and I'm wondering how
I'm working on some code for a loosely coupled cluster. To achieve optimal performance
I'm working with some code that is confusing me and I'm wondering if I'm
I was working on some code recently and came across a method that had
I am working on some code coverage for my applications. Now, I know that
I'm working with some code (not mine I hasten to add, I don't trust
I am working on some code written by a co-worker who no longer works
I'm working with some code that widely uses the idiom of returning a pointer
I have started working on some code left behind by previous developers, and I'm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.