Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8995293
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T23:36:02+00:00 2026-06-15T23:36:02+00:00

I would do something like the following in a Mako file: %for operation in

  • 0

I would do something like the following in a Mako file:

%for operation in operation_list:
    ${operation['name']}
    ${${operation['name']}Body()}
%endfor

<%def name="operationOneBody()">
   some stuff
</%def>

<%def name="operationTwoBody()">
   some other stuff
</%def>

Basically, I am expecting that the context will contain operations with names “operationOne” and “operationTwo” and I would like to dynamically decide which Mako Def to insert.

In the line ${${operation['name']}Body()} the idea is that in the inner ${} tag ${operation['name']} will resolve to “operationOne”, then “operationTwo” and so forth, so then the outer ${} will look like ${operationOneBody()} the first time through the loop and ${operationTwoBody()} the second time through, and so forth — which will cause the appropriate defs to get called, which will finally fill in the actual content I want in those places.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T23:36:03+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 11:36 pm

    You can put the functions into a dictionary keyed by the operation names. I think this should do what you want:

    <% operations = { 'one': operationOneBody, 'two': operationTwoBody } %>
    
    %for operation in operation_list:
        ${operation['name']}
        ${operations[operation['name']]()}
    %endfor
    
    <%def name="operationOneBody()">
       some stuff
    </%def>
    
    <%def name="operationTwoBody()">
        some other stuff
    </%def>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a file template.txt which contains the following: Hello ${something} I would like
I would like to do something like the following with spark. <viewdata model=IList[[string]] />
I would like to use something like the following: SELECT city FROM cities WHERE
I would like to do something like the following: if params[:entry].include? (http || www
I want something like the following but would like it to be reusable for
Would it be possible to do something like the following in c#? Basically TParent
The SQL would be something like select GeneralData.id, GeneralData.name, GeneralData.last_name, Student.id from GeneralData Inner
I have some MET data I want to validate which would look something like
I would something like the following recursive method: private Node getElementRec(Node currentNode, String ...
I'm a PHP guy, and in PHP I would do something like the following:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.