Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7696413
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T21:46:25+00:00 2026-05-31T21:46:25+00:00

I would expect subclass always call super() for some method. How can I enforce

  • 0

I would expect subclass always call super() for some method.
How can I enforce or at least give a warning at compile time?

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T21:46:26+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 9:46 pm

    I think that Chris White‘s answer is best in the general case. But chen ying’s comment “I know enforcing to call super is not good. But I did not own the super class. And SDK documentation requires to call super. for example link” suggests that it is not suitable in this particular instance.

    I would thus suggest modifying Chris White’s answer to meet the particulars.

    class ChenYingTestCase extends ServiceTestCase
    {
           /**
            * Gets the current system context and stores it.
            * You can not extend this method.
            * If you want to achieve the effect of extending this method,
            * you must override chenYingSetupMethod.
            **/
           public final void setUp ( )
           {
                 super.setUp ( ) ;
                 chenYingSetup ( ) ;
           }
    
           /**
            * Does nothing (unless you extend it)
            *
            * Extend this method to do your 
            * own test initialization. If you do so, there is no need to call super.setUp() 
            * Hint:  calling super.setUp() is probably a bad idea.
            * as the first statement in your override.
            * Just put your test initialization here.
            * The real SetUp method will call super.setUp() and then this method.
            **/
           protected void chenYingSetUp ( )
           {
           }
    }
    

    Then if a subclass is under your control make it a subclass of ChenYingTestCase. If the subclass is not under you control, well you can’t really force it to call super().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would expect that from the aspect of compile time as well as from
Usually I would expect a String.contains() method, but there doesn't seem to be one.
For some reason this sort code is not working as I would expect: std::fstream
I would expect this would be a common need. Can anyone help or point
I would expect the following code snippet to complain about trying to assign something
I would expect a Dictionary object of the form: var dict = new Dictionary<string,string>()
As you would expect from a DSL aimed at data analysis, R handles missing/incomplete
Using any tools which you would expect to find on a nix system (in
Python is doing string multiplication where I would expect it to do numeric multiplication,
The following code prints (when invoking MyMethod): 0 0 0 1 I would expect

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.