Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 288599
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:49:55+00:00 2026-05-12T05:49:55+00:00

I would like to add some methods to a class definition at runtime. However,

  • 0

I would like to add some methods to a class definition at runtime. However, when running the following code, I get some surprising (to me) results.

test.py

class klass(object):
    pass

for i in [1,2]:
    def f(self):
        print(i)
    setattr(klass, 'f' + str(i), f)

I get the following when testing on the command line:

>>> import test
>>> k = test.klass()
>>> k.f1()
2
>>> k.f2()
2

Why does k.f1() return 2 instead of 1? It seems rather counter intuitive to me.

notes

This test was done using python3.0 on a kubuntu machine.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:49:55+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:49 am

    It’s the usual problem of binding — you want early binding for the use of i inside the function and Python is doing late binding for it. You can force the earlier binding this way:

    class klass(object):
        pass
    
    for i in [1,2]:
        def f(self, i=i):
            print(i)
        setattr(klass, 'f' + str(i), f)
    

    or by wrapping f into an outer function layer taking i as an argument:

    class klass(object):
        pass
    
    def fmaker(i):
        def f(self):
            print(i)
        return f
    
    for i in [1,2]:
        setattr(klass, 'f' + str(i), fmaker(i))
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 153k
  • Answers 153k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer How secure does this app need to be? If you… May 12, 2026 at 10:24 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Trick is that you don't have context in the constructor… May 12, 2026 at 10:24 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yahoo pipes might be what you could use http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/ May 12, 2026 at 10:24 am

Related Questions

I use javadoc to document my classes and methods. I would like to add
Is there any way to redefine a class or some of its methods without
Just finished reading Crockford's JavaScript: The Good Parts and I have a question concerning
I would like to open a Word document in C#. I mean I would
Ruby can add methods to the Number class and other core types to get

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.