Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8099359
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T22:23:08+00:00 2026-06-05T22:23:08+00:00

I would like to be able to create a variable that holds an instance

  • 0

I would like to be able to create a variable that holds an instance of a model object User but not save it to the database. Is this possible? Right now when I a do the following it saves it to the database:

user = User.new
user.name = "John"
user.save

I would like to create a user variable that holds the previous information but not have to save it in the database. The reason is the function I need to use expects a User object and I don’t want to save users yet at that point in the code.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T22:23:11+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 10:23 pm

    As Dave said, just don’t save the user variable:

    user = User.new(:name => "John")
    

    Now you can still use methods by passing in the user variable, even though it isn’t saved to the database:

    puts "The user's name is: #{user.name}"
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to be able to create a bean whose scope is limited
I'm trying to create a .NET touchscreen application. I would like to be able
I would like to be able to use the same Session variable when transferring
I would like to create a Sublime Text 2 Snippet that fills up the
I would like to write a program that sets an environment variable in an
is there any way how to create something like data.frame object in R that
I would like to be able to use the created functions and objects I
Would like to be able to set colors of headings and such, different font
I would like to be able to change the size of text in a
I would like to be able to abort a specific sql statement if it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.