Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9148415
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T11:15:53+00:00 2026-06-17T11:15:53+00:00

I would like to clarify that the endpoint to endpoint transactions (peer to peer

  • 0

I would like to clarify that the endpoint to endpoint transactions (peer to peer transaction) of two PCIE endpoints behind a PCIE switch are not forwarded to the root complex.

I googled around and understand that if the transaction from Endpoint #1 targeted to the PCIE address space which the root port assigned to the Endpoint #2, the switch will forward the transaction to the downstream port where Endpoint #2 located.

Please correct me if I misunderstand this point. Is this forwarding feature mandatory according to the PCIE spec or implementation-specific?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T11:15:56+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 11:15 am

    At first, if a PCIe Switch supports Access Control Services(ACS) and the host software configures the Switch to redirect a P2P transaction to upstream, the Switch forwards the transaction towards Root Complex. So there is a case that a P2P transaction is forwarded to upstream.

    If the Switch does not support ACS or the host software disables ACS, the PCIe Switch will forward a P2P transaction to downstream directly. I think this routing is mandatory because the internal bridges of the PCI Switch should perform as conventional PCI-PCI bridges.


    Here are some references:

    If you can access the latest PCIe Specification, you can read about ACS capability in the spec. But if you are not a member, you can read the ECN of ACS because it is public, which will also be helpful. PDF

    Intel provides the useful document that describes why ACS is required.

    Here VMware requests that the PCIe Switch must support ACS to use PCI Passthrough.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

To start I would like to clarify that I'm not extremely well versed in
The first thing i would like to clarify is that i'm not talking about
I would just like to clarify that by 'design', I mean software design, not
I would like someone to clarify something for me: There are two kinds of
Would like to make anapplication in Java that will not automatically parse parameters used
I have some questions regarding MVC that I would like to clarify. At our
Im making a workout app and just would like to clarify that the way
I would like to clarify this issue. I had installed Cocos2d 1.01 rc on
Would like a for loop in jquery so that: For every hover_link: show hidden
I would like to clarify how browser scripting (such as javascript/jquery) differs from server

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.