Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7876507
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T03:10:38+00:00 2026-06-03T03:10:38+00:00

I would like to define several versions of a thing but with different types

  • 0

I would like to define several versions of a thing but with different types to enhance type safety in my program. For example I have several types of bivariate values which I want to be instances of Num but all should be different types. So what I have done is creating a newtype with one type variable and declared new types based on that. However, I find it slightly annoying that I now have to use both constructors all the time. Is there any way around this?

{-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-}

newtype Bivar t = Bivar (t,t) deriving (Show, Eq)

instance (Num t) => Num (Bivar t) where 
  (+) (Bivar (x1,y1)) (Bivar (x2,y2)) = Bivar (x1+x2, y1+y2)
  (-) (Bivar (x1,y1)) (Bivar (x2,y2)) = Bivar (x1-x2, y1-y2)
  (*) (Bivar (x1,y1)) (Bivar (x2,y2)) = Bivar (x1*x2, y1*y2)
  abs (Bivar (x1,y1)) = Bivar (abs x1, abs y1)
  fromInteger i = Bivar (fromInteger i, fromInteger i)
  signum (Bivar (x1,y1)) = Bivar (signum x1, signum y1)

newtype BivarNode = BivarNode (Bivar Int) deriving (Show, Eq, Num)
newtype BivarVal = BivarVal (Bivar Double) deriving (Show, Eq, Num)
newtype HBivarVal = HBivarVal (Bivar Double) deriving (Show, Eq, Num)

-- This is annoying:
a1 = BivarVal (Bivar (1.0, 2.0))
a2 = HBivarVal (Bivar (1.0, 2.0))
b = BivarNode (Bivar (1,2))

-- is there a way so that I can write it this way?
aa1 = BivarVal (1.0, 2.0)
aa2 = HBivarVal (1.0, 2.0)
bb = BivarNode (1,2)

thank you!

EDIT:

To expand on the original question, I would also like to use the type names on pattern matches, something along the lines of

myFunction :: HBivarVal -> Double
myFunction (HBivarVal (Bivar (x,y))) = x 

is that possible too?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T03:10:39+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 3:10 am

    Why not make all of them a newtype, even Bivar?

    instance (Num a, Num b) => Num (a, b) where
        (a, b) + (a', b') = (a+a', b+b')
        (a, b) * (a', b') = (a*a', b*b')
        (a, b) - (a', b') = (a-a', b-b')
        fromInteger i = (fromInteger i, fromInteger i)
        abs    (a, b) = (abs    a, abs    b)
        signum (a, b) = (signum a, signum b)
    
    newtype Bivar t   = Bivar     (t     , t     ) deriving (Show, Eq, Num)
    newtype BivarNode = BivarNode (Int   , Int   ) deriving (Show, Eq, Num)
    newtype BivarVal  = BivarVal  (Double, Double) deriving (Show, Eq, Num)
    newtype HBivarVal = HBivarVal (Double, Double) deriving (Show, Eq, Num)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a WPF application with several windows. I would like to define GLOBAL
I have several constant defined for a webservice, and I would like to make
I would like to define my own view class that consists of several Textviews,
I have several resources declared in XAML markup and would like to access the
I have an application with several DataGridView controls. I would like to create a
I would like to define the following in Javascript: var tileXml = new Array();
I would like to define a key & value in Settings.settings and bind the
I would like to define an ordered list with unordered sub-lists. You can see
I would like to define a constant (like the admin-email-adress) depending on the environment.
I would like to define and initialize some variables in web.xml and the access

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.