Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 527893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:55:51+00:00 2026-05-13T08:55:51+00:00

I would like to do something like: for(int i=0;i<10;i++) addresses[i] = & function(){ callSomeFunction(i)

  • 0

I would like to do something like:

for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
    addresses[i] = & function(){ callSomeFunction(i) };

Basically, having an array of addresses of functions with behaviours related to a list of numbers.

If it’s possible with external classes like Boost.Lambda is ok.

Edit: after some discussion I’ve come to conclusion that I wasn’t explicit enough. Please read Creating function pointers to functions created at runtime


What I really really want to do in the end is:

class X
{
    void action();
}

X* objects;

for(int i=0;i<0xFFFF;i++)
    addresses[i] = & function(){ objects[i]->action() };


void someFunctionUnknownAtCompileTime()
{

}

void anotherFunctionUnknowAtCompileTime()
{

}

patch someFunctionUnknownAtCompileTime() with assembly to jump to function at addresses[0]

patch anotherFunctionUnknownAtCompileTime() with assembly to jump to function at addresses[1]

sth, I don’t think your method will work because of them not being real functions but my bad in not explaining exactly what I want to do.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:55:51+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:55 am

    If I understand you correctly, you’re trying to fill a buffer with machine code generated at runtime and get a function pointer to that code so that you can call it.

    It is possible, but challenging. You can use reinterpret_cast<> to turn a data pointer into a function pointer, but you’ll need to make sure that the memory you allocated for your buffer is flagged as executable by the operating system. That will involve a system call (LocalAlloc() on Windows iirc, can’t remember on Unix) rather than a “plain vanilla” malloc/new call.

    Assuming you’ve got an executable block of memory, you’ll have to make sure that your machine code respects the calling convention indicated by the function pointer you create. That means pushing/popping the appropriate registers at the beginning of the function, etc.

    But, once you’ve done that, you should be able to use your function pointer just like any other function.

    It might be worth looking at an open source JVM (or Mono) to see how they do it. This is the essence of JIT compilation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 284k
  • Answers 284k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In addition to using Zend_Session or any of these PEAR… May 13, 2026 at 4:24 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The tipsy plugin seems to remove the title attribute and… May 13, 2026 at 4:24 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I had just installed Apache 2 on Ubuntu and it… May 13, 2026 at 4:24 pm

Related Questions

I have an array of different type objects and I use a BinaryWriter to
I have a sequence, e.g std::vector< Foo > someVariable; and I want a loop
Is there a method/pattern/library to do something like that (in pseudo-code): task_queue.push_back(ObjectType object1, method1);
EDIT: I missed a crucial point: .NET 2.0 Consider the case where I have
I want to check to see if an XML document contains a 'person' element

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.