Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 579391
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:21:44+00:00 2026-05-13T14:21:44+00:00

I would like to do the following: class A(object): pass a = A() a.__int__

  • 0

I would like to do the following:

class A(object): pass

a = A()
a.__int__ = lambda self: 3

i = int(a)

Unfortunately, this throws:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: int() argument must be a string or a number, not 'A'

This only seems to work if I assign the “special” method to the class A instead of an instance of it. Is there any recourse?

One way I thought of was:

def __int__(self):
    # No infinite loop
    if type(self).__int__.im_func != self.__int__.im_func:
        return self.__int__()
    raise NotImplementedError()

But that looks rather ugly.

Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:21:44+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:21 pm

    Python always looks up special methods on the class, not the instance (except in the old, aka “legacy”, kind of classes — they’re deprecated and have gone away in Python 3, because of the quirky semantics that mostly comes from looking up special methods on the instance, so you really don’t want to use them, believe me!-).

    To make a special class whose instances can have special methods independent from each other, you need to give each instance its own class — then you can assign special methods on the instance’s (individual) class without affecting other instances, and live happily ever after. If you want to make it look like you’re assigning to an attribute the instance, while actually assigning to an attribute of the individualized per-instance class, you can get that with a special __setattr__ implementation, of course.

    Here’s the simple case, with explicit “assign to class” syntax:

    >>> class Individualist(object):
    ...   def __init__(self):
    ...     self.__class__ = type('GottaBeMe', (self.__class__, object), {})
    ... 
    >>> a = Individualist()
    >>> b = Individualist()
    >>> a.__class__.__int__ = lambda self: 23
    >>> b.__class__.__int__ = lambda self: 42
    >>> int(a)
    23
    >>> int(b)
    42
    >>> 
    

    and here’s the fancy version, where you “make it look like” you’re assigning the special method as an instance attribute (while behind the scene it still goes to the class of course):

    >>> class Sophisticated(Individualist):
    ...   def __setattr__(self, n, v):
    ...     if n[:2]=='__' and n[-2:]=='__' and n!='__class__':
    ...       setattr(self.__class__, n, v)
    ...     else:
    ...       object.__setattr__(self, n, v)
    ... 
    >>> c = Sophisticated()
    >>> d = Sophisticated()
    >>> c.__int__ = lambda self: 54
    >>> d.__int__ = lambda self: 88
    >>> int(c)
    54
    >>> int(d)
    88
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.