Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6618805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T20:53:03+00:00 2026-05-25T20:53:03+00:00

I would like to ensure that var a has not changed between retrieving it

  • 0

I would like to ensure that var a has not changed between retrieving it and performing the update on var b.

var a = from item in....

if (a > 100) {
    var b = from item in...
    b.something = 100;
    db.SubmitChanges()
}

How would I go about doing this? Do I just wrap the thing in a TransactionScope?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T20:53:04+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 8:53 pm

    Linq 2 sql is designed for optimistic concurrency out of the box (what you want is pessimistic)
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb399373.aspx

    Due to possible deadlocks etc. with locking, I think you better stick to optimistic and handle the conflict resolution. Otherwise, have a look here: LINQ to SQL and Concurrency Issues

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to ensure that an object's destructor does not run. Is there
I would like to ensure that I only subscribe once in a particular class
Would like to make anapplication in Java that will not automatically parse parameters used
I have several lines of a method that I would like to ensure that
I am using Ruby on Rails and I would like to ensure that my
I would like to ensure that an entity is contained in at most one
Given this string: var str = 'A1=B2;C3,D0*E9+F6-'; I would like to retrieve the substring
I would like to mimic the Repository approach that is widely used in DDD
Would like to get a list of advantages and disadvantages of using Stored Procedures.
Would like to create a strong password in C++. Any suggestions? I assume it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.