Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8670759
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T18:47:00+00:00 2026-06-12T18:47:00+00:00

I would like to force a functions parameters to accept only specific definitions. For

  • 0

I would like to force a functions parameters to accept only specific definitions. For example, consider #define OUTPUT 1, #define INPUT 0 and void restrictedFunction(int parameter); .

How would I force restrictedFunction(int parameter) to accept only OUTPUT or INPUT?

I would also like to take into consideration that another definition may have the same value, for example, #define LEFT 1 and #define RIGHT 0.

So in this case I would like restrictedFunction(int parameter) to be able to accept only OUTPUT and INPUT specifically.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T18:47:01+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 6:47 pm
    typedef enum { INPUT = 0, OUTPUT = 1 } IO_Type;
    
    void restrictedFunction(IO_Type parameter) { ... }
    

    It doesn’t absolutely force the use of the values (the compiler will let someone write restrictedFunction(4)), but it is about as good as you’ll get.

    If you truly want to force the correct type, then:

    typedef enum { INPUT = 0, OUTPUT = 1 } IO_Type;
    typedef struct { IO_Type io_type } IO_Param;
    
    void restrictedFunction(IO_Param parameter) { ... }
    

    In C99 or later, you could call that with:

    restrictedFunction((IO_Param){ INPUT });
    

    This is a compound literal, creating a structure on the fly. It is not entirely clear that the structure type really buys you very much, but it will force the users to think a little and may improve the diagnostics from the compiler when they use it wrong (but they can probably use restrictedFunction((IO_Param){ 4 }); still).

    What this means is that your restrictedFunction() code should be ready to validate the argument:

    void restrictedFunction(IO_Type io_type)
    {
        switch (io_type)
        {
        case INPUT:
            ...do input handling...
            break;
        case OUTPUT:
            ...do output handling...
            break;
        default:
            assert(io_type != INPUT && io_type != OUTPUT);
            ...or other error handling...
            break;
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We would like to force encryption of the data going to and from our
I would like to force a \marginpar to appear on the wrong side of
I have an application I would like to force SSL on the login page
If I have an object that I would like to force to be accessed
I have a string property that I would like to be able to force
I recently found out about Cytoscape.js and would like to try out the force-directed
I would like to do some benchmarking on a few simple functions in C.
Please consider this example, how do we force implicit conversion in function whose second
Would like to parse IPv4 address from exit-addresses . Format of the file: ExitNode
Would like a for loop in jquery so that: For every hover_link: show hidden

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.