Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I would like to get some opinion regarding these two JMS providers in terms of :
I would like to use it together with NetBeans and GlassFish.
Thanks.
HornetQ has a concise documentation on hornetq.org. Maybe it’s just me but I often find myself lost on the redbooks on IBM while looking for the right documentation.
HornetQ has very few dependencies making it easy to manage.
You would need to compare feature by feature, but last time I looked at it HornetQ has more features.
Both are JMS compliant. However with HornetQ you have standard syncs out of the box.
In a another note, I made myself a performance comparison between HornetQ and WebSphere MQ and HornetQ was faster in all the usecases. I can’t publish the actual comparisson due to license issues with IBM.
Regarding glass fish you will have to integrate the Resource Adapter of HornetQ, but we haven’t dedicated many resources on testing it.
As for NetBeans that should be really easy.