Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6907665
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T08:27:49+00:00 2026-05-27T08:27:49+00:00

I would like to have one (global, singleton) object in my application that exposes

  • 0

I would like to have one (global, singleton) object in my application that exposes a number of dependency properties. I would like to bind values in XAML to these dependency properties. How can I achieve this so that the syntax of my XAML binding is as simple as possible (in other words, not constantly worrying about RelativeSource, AncestoryType, etc).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T08:27:49+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:27 am

    You can use the x:Static markup extension to bind directly to your Singleton, as it’s a static property.

    For example, if your singleton had a property named “Foo”:

    <TextBox Text="{x:Static local:YourSingleton.Instance.Foo}" />
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Greetings, I would like to ask if creating Singleton to have only one active
I have two LINQ statements that I would like to make into one, but
I have two views that I would like to combine into one. The first
I have one PHP5 object passing messages to another, and would like to attach
I would like to have one column in QTableWidget NOT editable. In forums I
I would like to have more than one button. I tried to copy code
I have one query on which I would like to get your valuable feedback.
I have one file in my project, (the readme file,) which I would like
I would like to have a mapping which maps two string into one string.
I have a simple one-to-many relationship. I would like to select rows from the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.