Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8410841
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T00:17:03+00:00 2026-06-10T00:17:03+00:00

I would like to have two constructors for a class, as follows: public MyClass()

  • 0

I would like to have two constructors for a class, as follows:

public MyClass()
{
    // do stuff here
}

public MyClass(int num)
{
    MyClass();
    // do other stuff here
}

Is the above the correct way to achieve my purpose? Is there some kind of shorthand which is better?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T00:17:04+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 12:17 am
    public MyClass()
    {
        // do stuff
    }
    
    public MyClass(int num)
        : this ()
    {
        // do other stuff with num
    }
    

    The : this() bit is called a Constructor Initialiser. Every constructor in C# has a an initialiser which runs before the body of the constructor itself. By default the initialiser is the parameterless constructor of the base class (or Object if the class is not explicitly derived from another class). This ensures that the members of a base class get initilised correctly before the rest of the derived class is constructed.

    The default constructor initialiser for each constructor can be overridden in two ways.

    1. The : this(...) construct specifies another constructor in the same class to be the initiliser for the constructor that it is applied to.
    2. The : base(...) construct specifies a constructor in the base class (usually not the parameterless constructor, as this is the default anyway).

    For more details than you probably want see the C# 4.0 language specification section 10.11.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have class like class A{ public: A(int a, boost::shared_ptr<int> ptr){ // whatever!
I would like to have two different log4j loggers in my application, and for
I currently have two Backbone models: user and project. I would like to have
I have two classes Invoice and InvoiceItem. I would like Invoice to have a
I have two images which i would like to compare and do different operations
I have two span elements that I would like to stay on the same
I have two classes that I would like to merge into a composite. These
I have two arrays that I would like to compare and ultimately wind up
I have two LINQ statements that I would like to make into one, but
I have two views that I would like to combine into one. The first

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.