Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4331330
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T10:05:31+00:00 2026-05-21T10:05:31+00:00

I would like to implement the following thing in C++: I would like to

  • 0

I would like to implement the following thing in C++:

I would like to have a bunch of child classes of a single class with the ability to call a function that takes a pair of objects of any of these types. There is supposed to be a generic implementation that is called for mixed types or the base type and specialised implementations which get called if two objects of the same derived type are used as arguments.

As far as I know, this is a classic application of double dispatch. However, I have the following constraint:

It must be possible to derive new classes from the existing ones and add new pair-functions for these new classes without changing existing classes, for instance in an external library..

The approach I proposed in my last question is faulty, and the solution proposed there only works for types that are known at the time when the base class is written.

Any suggestion on how to implement this? Is that even possible?

Update: Code says more than a thousand words. The following approach works:

#include <iostream>

class B;

class A
{
public:
  virtual void PostCompose(A* other)
    {
      other->PreCompose(this);
    }
  virtual void PreCompose(A* other)
    {
      std::cout << "Precomposing with an A object" << std::endl;
    }
  virtual void PreCompose(B* other);
};

class B : public A
{
public:
  using A::PreCompose;
  virtual void PostCompose(A* other)
    {
      other->PreCompose(this);
    }
  virtual void PostCompose(B* other)
    {
      other->PreCompose(this);
    }
  virtual void PreCompose(B* other)
    {
      std::cout << "Precomposing with a B object" << std::endl;
    }
};

void A::PreCompose(B* other)
  {
    PreCompose((A*)other);
  }

int main()
{
  B b;
  A* p = &b;
  p->PostCompose(p); // -> "Precomposing with a B object"
}

but it requires knowledge of B when implementing A. Is there a better way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T10:05:31+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 10:05 am

    Since the derived classes only need to detect if the parameter type matches the object type, you can just use a straightforward check.

    virtual void foo( base *argument_base ) {
        if ( derived *argument = dynamic_cast< derived * >( argument_base ) ) {
            argument->something = pair_match_foo;
        } else {
            base_class::foo( argument_base );
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to implement the following behaviour: I have a special media player,
I would like to implement a post build event that performs the following actions
I would like to implement the following simple pattern in an android app: Activity
I would like to implement a producer/consumer scenario that obeys interfaces that are roughly:
I'd like to use the following idiom, that I think is non-standard. I have
I have a horizontal LinearLayout that's programmatically filled with its children. I would like
I have a smart pointer type, and would like to construct an object that
I'd like your opinion on the following subject: Imagine we have a method that
I would like to implement something similar to a c# delegate method in PHP.
I would like to implement a data access object pattern in C++, but preferably

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.