Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6083007
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T11:21:09+00:00 2026-05-23T11:21:09+00:00

I would like to know if there is a better way (that is, less

  • 0

I would like to know if there is a better way (that is, less coding) to have the same output as the following code:

# arg = :a, :b, :c

output = args.to_a.flatten.compact.map(&:to_sym)
# => [:a, :b, :c]

I use the above code to parse arguments passed by a method in this way

`method_name(:a, :b, :c)`.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T11:21:09+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 11:21 am

    I don’t see any need for to_a, flatten or compact.

    You can just do .map(&:to_sym) if you want to convert strings to symbols. If you’re only accepting symbols, just args contains what you want.

    def method_name(*args)
       p args.map(&:to_sym)
    end
    
    method_name(:a, "b", :c)
    

    Output

    [:a, :b, :c]
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to know if there is a way to check if a
I would like to know if there is maybe a finally that i can
I would like to know if there is any way to add custom behaviour
I would like to know if there is some way to share a variable
I would like to know if there is a way to disable automatic loading
I would like to know if there is an easy way to detect if
I would like to know if there is any easy way to print multiple
I would like to know if there are any xml coding standards. <?xml version=1.0?>
I would like to know the better way to arrange the list items for
I would like to know if there are general rules for creating an index

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.