Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3313464
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:07:06+00:00 2026-05-17T22:07:06+00:00

I would like to numerically find the solution to u_t – u_xx – u_yy

  • 0

I would like to numerically find the solution to

u_t - u_xx - u_yy = f on the square y ∈ [0,1], x ∈ [0,1]

where f=1 if in the unit circle and f=0 otherwise. The boundary conditions are u=0 on all four edges.

I have been trying to use ND-solve for ages but I keep getting error messages. I’m new to Mathematica so I don’t know how to define f before ND-Solve.

Thank you in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:07:07+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:07 pm

    The Mathematica help files are incredibly complete for stuff like this. I’m going to reference the online version, but note that, in the help browser in Mathematica, you can interactively modify and evaluate the help examples. This was the only way I learned much about Mathematica.

    One point before you start trying more things: It’s very easy to define a function, such as u or f when intending to make a comparison statement. A surefire, but somewhat lazy, way of fixing potential lingering problems from this is to quit the current kernel and then evaluate something again. Quitting the kernel loses all symbols you may have accidentally defined up to that point. (Starting up a new kernel is also why Mathematica churns a little bit the first time you do any operation, even if it’s simple addition.)

    Continuing on with the question at hand… In the reference I linked above, a sample is given which solves the one-dimensional heat equation which is very similar to your example. Let’s start with that and modify it:

    NDSolve[{D[u[t, x], t] == D[u[t, x], x, x], u[0, x] == Q0, 
      u[t, 0] == Sin[t], u[t, 5] == 0},
      u, {t, 0, 10}, {x, 0, 5}]
    

    Their equations are ∂ut = ∂uxx with boundary conditions of the initial energy being Q0 at time 0 ∀x, the energy at x = 0 being sin(t) and the energy at x = 5 being 0 ∀t. You can see above how those map hopefully. Now, let’s try to the same for your terms:

    NDSolve[{D[u[t, x, y], t] - D[u[t, x, y], x, x] - D[u[t, x, y], y, y] == f[x, y],
      f[x,y] == If[x^2 + y^2 < 1, 1, 0],
      u[t, 0, y] == 0, u[t, 1, y] == 0, 
      u[t, x, 0] == 0, u[t, y, 1] == 0 }
      u, {x, 0, 1}, {y, 0, 1}]
    

    I think that’s about right. However, there’s at least one problem here still, though. t is still a free variable. You didn’t provide any equations to restrain it, so the system is underspecified.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.