Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7600869
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T23:01:12+00:00 2026-05-30T23:01:12+00:00

I would like to understand what might be going on with invoking variable-arity methods

  • 0

I would like to understand what might be going on with invoking variable-arity methods using Java reflection. Let’s say we have a simple method:

void doAllTheThings(Object ... things) {
  // ...which does something with all the things...
}

And we want to invoke it dynamically, so we grab the method through reflection:

Method doItAll = Superklass.getDeclaredMethod("doAllTheThings", Object[].class);

And pass in an array:

Object[] allTheThings = new Object[] { "abc", true, 15 };
doItAll.invoke(allTheThings);

Now, this doesn’t seem to work quite like my intuition had figured; in particular, I seem to be getting various shades of IllegalArgumentException when I try invoking a method with varargs like this.

There’s clearly something I’m missing here. My guess is this is related somehow to how the variables get marshalled into the varargs. I’ve found this four year old blog post which seems to be talking about the same issue, but am unable to reproduce the ‘successful’ case there. Any thoughts on what might be going on here?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T23:01:14+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 11:01 pm

    You need to pass in an Object[][] in this case:

    Object[] allTheThings = new Object[] { "abc", true, 15 };
    doItAll.invoke(o, new Object[]{allTheThings});
    

    The reason is that the single things parameter is converted by the compiler into a single parameter of type Object[], and invoke takes an array with the values of the parameters.

    Consider a method with more parameters to make it clearer:

    void doMoreThings(Foo bar, Object ... things) { ... }
    
    Object[] allTheThings = new Object[] { "abc", true, 15 };
    doMore.invoke(o, new Object[]{new Foo(), allTheThings});
    

    invoke is itself declared to take varargs, so you can let the compiler create the outer array for you. But it won’t do this if you pass an Object[], because it thinks you already did that. So just hide that fact from the compiler:

    doItAll.invoke(o, (Object)allTheThings);
    doMore.invoke(o, new Foo(), allTheThings);
    

    Note the cast in the first line, now the compiler does not now anymore that there is already an array, so it creates one. In the second line this is not needed, because the compiler has no other chance anyway.

    Edit:
    Note that your code does not even compile because you missed to pass an instance of the class with the doAllTheThings method to invoke (I named it o in my code).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Conceptually, I would like to accomplish the following but have had trouble understand how
Conceptually, I would like to accomplish the following but have had trouble understand how
We are checking out git and would like to understand which workflow might suit
I would like to understand that what is Mesh Object and its conection with
I would like to understand what class << self stands for in the next
I am developing a Rails application and would like to understand when to use
I would like to better understand the basic steps needed to a take an
I would like to know and understand the steps involved in fetching mail from
I would like to know this to understand why some games like Mario is
I would like to know about the Invoke(delegate) method. I do not understand why

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.