Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6596027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T18:01:06+00:00 2026-05-25T18:01:06+00:00

I would like to understand why it could be useful to do this (assuming

  • 0

I would like to understand why it could be useful to do this (assuming “object” was previously allocated):

[object release]; 
object=nil;

Thx for helping,

Stephane

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T18:01:07+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 6:01 pm

    Even though you release an object, your variable will still point to something. What it points to is undefined. It could still point to the old object, or to some point in memory. Setting it to nil avoids sending messages to whatever it points to, and prevents errors (messaging nil does nothing).

    Here’s an answer that states it better: Setting pointers to nil, objective-c

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to understand that what is Mesh Object and its conection with
I would like to know this to understand why some games like Mario is
I would like to understand what class << self stands for in the next
I am developing a Rails application and would like to understand when to use
I would like to better understand the basic steps needed to a take an
I would like to know and understand the steps involved in fetching mail from
I would like to know about the Invoke(delegate) method. I do not understand why
Conceptually, I would like to accomplish the following but have had trouble understand how
Conceptually, I would like to accomplish the following but have had trouble understand how
I would like to understand how to convert basic C/C++ loops to a CUDA

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.