Home/ Questions/Q 6814685
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-26T20:43:04+00:00

I would like to upgrade an existing storage subsystem with enterprise level SSDs. However,

  • 0

I would like to upgrade an existing storage subsystem with enterprise level SSDs. However, I have found little evidence on whether the enclosure cache should be set to WriteBack or WriteThrough.

I imagine that some subsystems may handle this better than others, where reordering queued I/O requests does not matter on an SSD as there isn’t any seek time.

I believe that the WriteBack setting allows the controller to send an immediate I/O completion message back to the host before actually writing the data to disk. But on an SSD is this delay significant?

I am leaning towards writethrough and ditching the battery backup unit, but I would be interested to hear any subsystem SSD experiences on this.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I have used WriteBack in the past for two primary reasons:

    1) Faster writes from the host perspective.

    2) Reordering disk writes.

    Faster writes allow the host to write to enclosure RAM and then continue on (with battery backup of course). Reordering allows these writes to take place in a different order than they were received from the host. Data can be written at leisure when the read/write heads are in close vicinity to a write location. Though I haven’t read it specifically, I would speculate that some enclosures are more efficient at reordering packets and deferring writes than others, based on the understanding and skills of the team writing the firmware.

    Let’s compare an SSD drive with a 15k SAS drive. Using an Intel 320 for example, the specs show up to 38000 random IOPS during reads (14000 for writes), while 15k disks can reach, say 200 random IOPS during reads. That would give each SSD drive the same speed as about 190 hard drives.

    Since SSD’s are not subject to speed increases by reordering writes like spining disks are, and because of the high throughput of the SSD’s, it would seem that the usefulness of WriteBack has been mostly eliminated. Therefore, based on this logic, and from what research I was able to find, I would recommend using WriteThrough for SSD SCSI enclosures, while allowing Read Caching to occur (debatable). I would also disable any Read Ahead caching schemes. It seems pointless to pre-read something that can already move almost 300 MB/sec.

    Using SSD drives in RAID enclosures, the bottleneck moves from disk IOPS to the RAID enclosure link (iSCSI/Fibre), unless of course you are fortunate enough to have 10GB speeds.

    • 0