Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6648693
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T00:41:07+00:00 2026-05-26T00:41:07+00:00

I would like to use the Ruby gem Turn , but it currently collides

  • 0

I would like to use the Ruby gem Turn, but it currently collides with a model (ActiveRecord) I have called ‘Turn’. The end result is that my test output is borked.

I realize I can simply refactor my model, but I’m wondering if there’s a graceful way I can namespace the gem without having to touch my model.

Any suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T00:41:08+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 12:41 am

    Unfortunately there’s no way to influence which modules (namespaces) a gem will use. Files that are required by Ruby will always be evaluated in the global scope.

    It’s best practice for gem authors to use a module with the same name of the gem, so usually you know what to expect when you install a gem.

    Apart from not using Turn, the only solutions are to change your model’s name or place it inside a namespace.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to use Ruby Net::SMTP to send email. The routine send_message( msgstr,
I would like to use the net/imap library in ruby behind a authenticated proxy,
I'm writing a Ruby script and would like to use a n-ary tree data
I would like to use a component that exposes the datasource property, but instead
I use blocks in Ruby and would like to use them in Java. Groovy
I am using Ruby on Rails 3.0.7 and I would like to use check
I am using Ruby on Rails 3.1 and I would like to have an
I am using AdoNetAppender (SQL server) in my asp.net application and would like use
I would like to use a language that I am familiar with - Java,
I would like to use something like CLR Profiles on .Net 2.0 to see

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.