Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 208729
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:51:07+00:00 2026-05-11T17:51:07+00:00

I would really like to do something like this: Callable<MyObject> myCallable = …. Future<MyObject>

  • 0

I would really like to do something like this:

 Callable<MyObject> myCallable = ....
 Future<MyObject> = new Thread( myCallable).start();

I basically want to start a single long-running task that runs in parallel with my main task, and I do not want pooling or thread re-use. The Executors stuff seems to be very pooling oriented and it requires me to shut down the pool, all of which I don’t want to do.

I want to use the “Callable/Future” pattern because I may later have to introduce Executors, but as things currently stand they’re just overhead.

Any suggestions ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:51:07+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:51 pm

    Try FutureTask. It doesn’t have any explicit dependency on the Executor framework and can be instantiated as is, or you can extend it to customize it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to update my SQL lite database with the native update-method of
I would like to get a sum from a column, with and without a
I would like to remove/delete a migration file. How would I go about doing
(please excuse that I didn't use aliases). I would like my query output to
I want to have generalised email templates. Currently I have multiple email templates with
I want the messagebox to only show if the number is equal to 0.
There doesn't seem to be any tried and true set of best practices to
I'm trying to write test harness for part of my Android mapping application. I
I know its probably possible, but is it practical and doable to try and
I know its probably possible, but is it practical and doable to try and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.