Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 51031
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:41:10+00:00 2026-05-10T16:41:10+00:00

I wrote a Java program to add and retrieve data from an MS Access.

  • 0

I wrote a Java program to add and retrieve data from an MS Access. At present it goes sequentially through ~200K insert queries in ~3 minutes, which I think is slow. I plan to rewrite it using threads with 3-4 threads handling different parts of the hundred thousands records. I have a compound question:

  • Will this help speed up the program because of the divided workload or would it be the same because the threads still have to access the database sequentially?

  • What strategy do you think would speed up this process (except for query optimization which I already did in addition to using Java’s preparedStatement)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:41:11+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:41 pm

    First, don’t use Access. Move your data anywhere else — SQL/Server — MySQL — anything. The DB engine inside access (called Jet) is pitifully slow. It’s not a real database; it’s for personal projects that involve small amounts of data. It doesn’t scale at all.

    Second, threads rarely help.

    The JDBC-to-Database connection is a process-wide resource. All threads share the one connection.

    ‘But wait,’ you say, ‘I’ll create a unique Connection object in each thread.’

    Noble, but sometimes doomed to failure. Why? Operating System processing between your JVM and the database may involve a socket that’s a single, process-wide resource, shared by all your threads.

    If you have a single OS-level I/O resource that’s shared across all threads, you won’t see much improvement. In this case, the ODBC connection is one bottleneck. And MS-Access is the other.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 57k
  • Answers 57k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer sys.excepthook may help you here, where you can set a… May 11, 2026 at 8:21 am
  • added an answer You could define it like: T[] GetDataFromTable1<T>() where T:IDto {… May 11, 2026 at 8:21 am
  • added an answer Try this EDIT As Konrad pointed out, just keep it… May 11, 2026 at 8:21 am

Top Members

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.