Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7924439
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T17:45:10+00:00 2026-06-03T17:45:10+00:00

I’d like to be able to somehow create a dynamic array that would still

  • 0

I’d like to be able to “somehow” create a dynamic array that would still let me build its elements using the new operator.
Here’s what I’d like to achieve:

A* a = new A[3]; //or any equivalent syntax 
new (&a[0]) A(myparams1); //placement new on first slot 
new (&a[1]) A(myparams2, ...); //placement new on 2nd slot 
new (&a[2]) A(myparams3, ...); //placement new on 3rd slot
delete[] a; //correct deletion of all elements

I’m aware that this code would work (minus the 3 elements overwritten), but I’d like to avoid creating 3 default a elements in the first call to new[]. I am assuming here that I will always place 3 elements before calling delete[].
I’m thinking such a thing can be achieved by using intelligent calls to A::operator new[] but I’m not sure how.
Does anyone have any idea? it’s mostly for curiosity

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T17:45:12+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 5:45 pm

    You just get raw memory instead:

    void* mem = ::operator new(capacity * sizeof(A));
    

    This is required to be aligned for any type, including an array of A‘s. Now you can construct in it:

    for (std::size_t i = 0; i < capacity; ++i)
    {
        void* addr = static_cast<char*>(mem) + i * sizeof(A);
        new (addr) A(x, y, z, ...);
    }
    

    Destruction requires you explicitly invoke it:

    for (std::size_t i = 0; i < capacity; ++i)
    {
        void* addr = static_cast<char*>(mem) + i * sizeof(A);
        static_cast<A*>(addr)->~A();
    }
    

    And now you can free the raw memory:

    ::operator delete(mem);
    

    Note that none of this is exception-safe. It’s also what std::vector<A> does, check out the code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a string like this: La Torre Eiffel paragonata all&#8217;Everest What PHP function
I've got a string that has curly quotes in it. I'd like to replace
I would like to run a str_replace or preg_replace which looks for certain words
I'm parsing an RSS feed that has an &#8217; in it. SimpleXML turns this
We're building an app, our first using Rails 3, and we're having to build
I'm trying to create an if statement in PHP that prevents a single post
I am reading a book about Javascript and jQuery and using one of the
I am trying to render a haml file in a javascript response like so:
I have a French site that I want to parse, but am running into
I'm using v2.0 of ClassTextile.php, with the following call: $testimonial_text = $textile->TextileRestricted($_POST['testimonial']); ... and

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.