Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I’d like to get more performance out of BitBlt for capturing the screen. When Aero remains enabled, capturing only a 400×400 pixel area of the screen reduces capture time from an average of 50ms (full 1920×1200) to about 33ms (for 400×400) on my machine. This is a disappointingly low improvement.
Is my only option disabling Aero? I do know that i can get a blinding fast 3ms capture on the full screen when Aero is disabled.
A screen capture in Aero mode is very expensive because it requires synchronization with the DWM (think about waiting for everyone not blink their eyes to take a group photo), and locking the entire GPU pipe on Vista. On Windows 7 GDI performance is improved by accelerate common GDI operations and reduce GDI locking)
There are attempts of either using undocumented DWM functions or hooks to get the shared surface used by DWM. But you still need to pay the price to move data from video memory to system RAM via the sometimes slow FSB if you plan to process the image data (e.g. send to a network or save to file).