Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 587361
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:12:15+00:00 2026-05-13T15:12:15+00:00

I’d like to package a library I’m working on as a header-only library to

  • 0

I’d like to package a library I’m working on as a header-only library to make it easier for clients to use. (It’s small and there’s really no reason to put it into a separate translation unit) However, I cannot simply put my code in headers because this violates C++’s one definition rule. (Assuming that the library header is included in multiple translation units of a client project)

How does one modify a library to make it header-only?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:12:16+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:12 pm

    You can use the inline keyword:

    // header.hpp (included into multiple translation units)
    
    void foo_bad() {} // multiple definitions, one in every translation unit :(
    
    inline void foo_good() {} // ok :)
    

    inline allows the linker to simply pick one definition and discard the rest.

    (As such, if those definitions don’t actually match, you get a good dose of undefined behavior…!)


    As an aside, member functions defined within a class-type, are implicitly marked inline:

    struct myclass
    {
        void i_am_inline_implicitly()
        {
            // because my definition is here
        }
    
        void but_i_am_not();
        void neither_am_i();
    };
    
    inline void myclass::but_i_am_not()
    {
        // but that doesn't mean my definition cannot be explicitly inline
    }
    
    void myclass::neither_am_i()
    {
        // but in this case, no inline for me :(
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.