Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3286300
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T20:21:52+00:00 2026-05-17T20:21:52+00:00

I’d like to say int x = magic(), y = moremagic(); return i =>

  • 0

I’d like to say

int x = magic(), y = moremagic();
return i => i + (x/y);

and have the x be captured as a constant instead of a variable reference. The idea is that x will never change and so when the expression is later compiled, the compiler to can do constant folding and produce more efficient code — i.e. calculating x/y once instead of on every call, via pointer dereferences into a closure record.

There is no way to mark x as readonly within a method, and the compiler is not clever enough to detect that it doesn’t change after the creation of the expression.

I’d hate to have to build the expression by hand. Any brilliant ideas?

UPDATE: I ended up using the marvelous LinqKit to build a partial evaluator that will do the substitutions I want. The transform is only safe if you know that relevant references will not change, but it worked for my purposes. It is possible to restrict the partial evaluation only to direct members of your closure, which you control, by adding an extra check or two in there, which is fairly obvious on inspection of the sample code provided in the LinqKit.

/// <summary>Walks your expression and eagerly evaluates property/field members and substitutes them with constants.
/// You must be sure this is semantically correct, by ensuring those fields (e.g. references to captured variables in your closure)
/// will never change, but it allows the expression to be compiled more efficiently by turning constant numbers into true constants, 
/// which the compiler can fold.</summary>
public class PartiallyEvaluateMemberExpressionsVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
    protected override Expression VisitMemberAccess(MemberExpression m)
    {
        Expression exp = this.Visit(m.Expression);

        if (exp == null || exp is ConstantExpression) // null=static member
        {
            object @object = exp == null ? null : ((ConstantExpression)exp).Value;
            object value = null; Type type = null;
            if (m.Member is FieldInfo)
            {
                FieldInfo fi = (FieldInfo)m.Member;
                value = fi.GetValue(@object);
                type = fi.FieldType;
            }
            else if (m.Member is PropertyInfo)
            {
                PropertyInfo pi = (PropertyInfo)m.Member;
                if (pi.GetIndexParameters().Length != 0)
                    throw new ArgumentException("cannot eliminate closure references to indexed properties");
                value = pi.GetValue(@object, null);
                type = pi.PropertyType;
            }
            return Expression.Constant(value, type);
        }
        else // otherwise just pass it through
        {
            return Expression.MakeMemberAccess(exp, m.Member);
        }
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T20:21:52+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 8:21 pm

    No there is no way to do this in C#. The compiler does not support capturing variables by value / const. Nor can you convert a non-const value into a const value at runtime in this manner.

    Additionally the C# compiler only does constant folding during the initial compilation for known constant values. If it was possible to freeze a value at runtime into a constant it wouldn’t participate in compiler constant folding because it happens at runtime.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some data like this: 1 2 3 4 5 9 2 6
I am trying to loop through a bunch of documents I have to put
I have a bunch of posts stored in text files formatted in yaml/textile (from
I'm making a simple page using Google Maps API 3. My first. One marker

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.