Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6721371
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T09:19:21+00:00 2026-05-26T09:19:21+00:00

If a and b were lists of objects, each with a name property (e.g.

  • 0

If a and b were lists of objects, each with a name property (e.g. a1 = A("1"), b1 = B("1"), etc.), how would I check for equivalency? I’m currently doing this:

aList = [ a1, a2, a3, a4, a5 ]
bList = [ b1, b2 ]
aNameList = []
bNameList = []

for i in aList:
    aNameList.append( i.name )
for i in bList:
    bNameList.append( i.name )

match = set(aNameList) & set(bNameList)

>>> set(['1', '2'])

But it seems kind of long and unnecessary. What is a better way to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T09:19:22+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 9:19 am

    You can use list comprehensions instead to replace those temporary lists and for-loops of your example:

    match = set( [ x.name for x in aList ] ) & set ( [ x.name for x in bList ] )
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two lists of objects. Each list is already sorted by a property
I have a ObservableCollection of Patient objects. Each Patient object has a Name property,
I have a list of Point objects, (each one with x,y properties) and would
I have these objects: Public Class MakeInfo Public Property Name As String Public Property
I have a list of objects and each and every object in the list
I have a list of objects, each containing an Id, Code and Description. I
I have a list of objects. Each object has an integer quantity and a
I have these container objects (let's call them Container) in a list. Each of
I have a List, it has Foo objects, and each Foo has a start
My application uses a large amount of Panda objects. Each Panda has a list

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.