Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4604412
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T00:17:32+00:00 2026-05-22T00:17:32+00:00

If a have an array of pointers to an object, which way of filling

  • 0

If a have an array of pointers to an object, which way of filling the array is cleaner, (1) or (2), in the code segment below? Are

string ** list = new string*[5];
string* s = new string("foo");
*list[0] = *s;  //(1)
list[0] = s;   //(2)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T00:17:33+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 12:17 am

    The first method will result in undefined behaviour. list[0] doesn’t point at a valid string object, so dereferencing it and assigning to it will be bad.

    The second method looks ok to me (in the sense that it won’t have undefined behaviour), but I guess it depends on how you go on to use it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class with an array of scoped pointers to objects which do
I have seen code that uses arrays of strings in the following way. string
I have an array of pointers to Objective-C objects. These objects have a sort
I have the template class and array of pointers to objects and overloaded logic
I have an array of pointers to a base class, so that I can
What if i want to have an array of pointers to a function and
I couldn't find anything similar to this anywhere. I have an array of pointers
I have an array of double pointers, but every time I try do print
If i have a pointer to an array of pointers, is the pointer to
I'm a Java programer lost in C++ and pointers :D I have an array

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.