Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 84163
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:53:15+00:00 2026-05-10T21:53:15+00:00

If a packed Javascript saves 20kb off the download size, but takes a perfomance

  • 0

If a packed Javascript saves 20kb off the download size, but takes a perfomance hit to unpack, then are there any benefits, besides obfuscating the code?

I’ve made this a community wiki because it may be open to some discussion.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:53:16+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:53 pm

    Packed javascript code generally does not take longer to execute vs regular code. Most code packers will shorten variables, function names and use a host of tricks to make the source smaller. The resulting source is fully executable! You can verify this by taking a look at it during runtime with firebug. You’ll see the compressed code executing in its minimized form.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any ability to build maven artifact which will contain only resources but
Is there a JavaScript command that will cause the Visual Studio 2010 debugger to
I have a minified/packed javascript file which is causing problems. The issue is that
The following applet is compiled and packed into jar which is then signed with
Are there any packet capture tools (like tcpdump and wireshark) for Nokia N8/ symbian
Say I have a fairly hefty JavaScript file, packed down to roughly 100kb or
I am trying to get text to display using JavaScript but I can't seem
I have a HTML5/Javascript (Sencha) app that I have packed into PhoneGap for iOS
Rails 2.2.2 _competition.html.erb <p>This is packed</p> <% pack do %> // some javascript <%
I just found Dean Edwards javascript packer here: http://dean.edwards.name/packer/ It has a couple of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.