Question

If a queue is to be accessed by several threads, but it’s currently only being modified by a single method getNextInQueue(), what’s the most appropriate form of synchronizing access to the queue?

Currently, I declared the queue as a ConcurrentLinkedQueue, but I don’t want to reach a deadlock where multiple threads are waiting for a lock to be released. Another way I can handle this is by not synchronizing the queue, but synchronizing getNextInQueue(). However, as this code is used in the future, I don’t think this will scale as well. (Every programmer that makes modifications to the queue will have to ensure that she synchronizes the operation.)

Thoughts?

Answer 1

I think the easiest, and most correct way is use the ConcurrentLinkedQueue. I do not believe this would cause a deadlock, however. The one thing I am not sure of, however, is how the Concurrent wrappers handle situations where you use an iterator. I seem to remember having to fall back to the old synchronized method of wrapping all calls to the underlying collection (reads and writes). I am pretty sure thats what the Concurrent wrapper is doing, though.