Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 534279
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:35:44+00:00 2026-05-13T09:35:44+00:00

If a software project supports a version of Python that multiprocessing has been backported

  • 0

If a software project supports a version of Python that multiprocessing has been backported to, is there any reason to use threading.Lock over multiprocessing.Lock? Would a multiprocessing lock not be thread safe as well?

For that matter, is there a reason to use any synchronization primitives from threading that are also in multiprocessing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:35:45+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:35 am

    The threading module’s synchronization primitive are lighter and faster than multiprocessing, due to the lack of dealing with shared semaphores, etc. If you are using threads; use threading’s locks. Processes should use multiprocessing’s locks.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given that every software project only has so many programmer-hours dedicated to it, how
I have a software project that has the following structure. - Library A -
I'm doing a Java software-project at my university that mainly is about storing data-sets
I am working with a team that works on a very large software project,
I'm doing a grad-school software engineering project and I'm looking for the protocol that
I'm doing background research for a project to write a software tool that converts
Is there any way, any free software capable of automatic file upload? Let's say
Now, I'm doing a project, I would like to implement this software supports multiple
Does anyone know of a good software development framework or similar that has the
I have a small software project with a couple clients. What I'm looking for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.