If all methods are public unless they are explicitly defined as something else, is it ever necessary to define a method as public?
If all methods are public unless they are explicitly defined as something else, is
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
If all methods are public unless they are explicitly defined as something else, is it ever necessary to define a method as public?
Well, you answered the question already by naming the default: no, it is not necessary.
To quote the manual:
However, I consider it good practise to always do so.