Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1056509
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T17:43:29+00:00 2026-05-16T17:43:29+00:00

If Collection defines hasNext() instead of iterator().hasNext() , we could write loop easier: while(collection.hasNext()){…}

  • 0

If Collection defines hasNext() instead of iterator().hasNext(), we could write loop easier:

while(collection.hasNext()){…}

instead of:

Iterator it= collection.iterator();
While(it.hasNext()){…}

Of course, I know easy way for loop for(E e:collection) exists.

Why interface Iterator exists?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T17:43:29+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:43 pm

    That would not be thread safe. The collection would only be able to maintain one “current position” so you couldn’t iterate over it simultaneously in two different threads.

    Having iterators allows multiple simultaneous iterating threads that don’t step on each others’ toes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In C#, the IEnumerator interface defines a way to traverse a collection and look
Is there an easy way to wrap an ADODB.Connection COM object (the one defined
The Vector API defines 4 different constructors: Vector() Vector(Collection<? extends E> c) Vector(int initialCapacity)
Is foreach by-definition guaranteed to iterate the subject collection (if it defines order) sequentially
The following XAML (below) defines a custom collection in resources and attempts to populate
I want to write an user defined error collection class which should collect all
the other day I was wondering why scala.collection.Map defines its unzip method as def
JavaDoc defines set as : A collection that contains no duplicate elements. More formally,
I have rather weird problem with paperclip gem. You know it defines Attachment class
Solved it myself. It was the way I initialised the Settings collection. Specifying a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.