Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6380025
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T02:12:50+00:00 2026-05-25T02:12:50+00:00

If I am keeping a collection of people in a SQL database, and each

  • 0

If I am keeping a collection of people in a SQL database, and each person has a separate collection of objects of the same data type, what is the best way to store the objects and keep them linked to their owners? It seems like multiple tables would be more efficient when reading only one person’s objects, but since there are a variable and unlimited number of people obviously there cannot be a table for each person’s objects.

Is the usual strategy to create one table for all the people’s objects and include an index with each object to identify the object’s owner, or is there a better way to store and link the data?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T02:12:51+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:12 am

    One table for people and one table for objects. Store the person ID with each object and then to get the objects for a person simply query the objects table against their person ID.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following hypothetical people management system. Suppose each Person object belong to a
I am keeping some application meta data in SharedPreferences . Whenever I uninstall the
I am keeping three image views with 3 different images of the same height.
I have a site that is essentially a collection of links. A mysql database
I am trying to store word frequency data using Mongo. Each word needs to
I am having trouble keeping a ListBox updated with child objects. I'm using two
I want to use LINQ to pass data from one custom collection to another.
I am working on a slide-based application in C++. Each slide has a slide-items
I spin off a new thread that reads data from a database. Every X
How should I implement very fast lookups of items in a collection? class Person(object):

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.