Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8813237
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T03:47:52+00:00 2026-06-14T03:47:52+00:00

If I am using this code why has the scope changed for the doStuff

  • 0

If I am using this code why has the scope changed for the “doStuff” alert? Is there a way that I can make sure that the scope is my object and not the Window object?

Here is the same code in jsfiddle.

(function ($) {
    var c$ = {};

    c$.TestScope = function () {

        this.doAjax = function (onComplete) {
            var self = this;
            $.ajax({
                url: 'badurl',
                complete: function (data) {
                    alert('doAjax2 self === c$.oTestScope: ' + (self === c$.oTestScope).toString());
                    onComplete(data);
                }
            });
            alert('doAjax1 self === c$.oTestScope: ' + (self === c$.oTestScope).toString());  
        };

        this.doStuff = function (data) {
            var self = this;
            alert('doStuff self === c$.oTestScope: ' + (self === c$.oTestScope).toString());
        }

    };

    c$.oTestScope = new c$.TestScope();
    c$.oTestScope.doAjax(c$.oTestScope.doStuff);
})(jQuery);​
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T03:47:54+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 3:47 am

    You should be able to specify the this value as the context in your $.ajax() parameters:

    var c$ = {};
    
    c$.TestScope = function() {
    
        this.doAjax = function(onComplete) {
    
            alert('doAjax1 this === c$.oTestScope: ' + (this === c$.oTestScope).toString());
    
            $.ajax({
                url: 'badurl',
                context: this,
                complete: function(data) {
                    alert('doAjax2 this === c$.oTestScope: ' + (this === c$.oTestScope).toString());
                    onComplete.call(this, data);
                }
            });
        };
    
        this.doStuff = function(data) {
            alert('doStuff this === c$.oTestScope: ' + (this === c$.oTestScope).toString());
        }
    
    };
    
    c$.oTestScope = new c$.TestScope();
    c$.oTestScope.doAjax(c$.oTestScope.doStuff);
    

    Edit I made a fiddle for this and verified that it works properly. There’s no messing around with an extra self parameter or having to muck around with closures to keep your variables.

    Part of what you were missing was calling onComplete.call(this, data) to invoke doStuff().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm using a tutorial plugin - http://particlebits.com/code/jquery-tutorial/ which has this code attached to the
While using this code to serialize an object: public object Clone() { var serializer
so im still stuck on this that i can create remote shared object but
I'm not quite sure if I'm not using this in the correct scope or
Now i'm using this code: User has_one User_extra User => :username, :email, :crypted_password, :salt,
Using this code, i am able to send a notification to my own device.
Using this code to zip a folder and it works perfect on small files
Using this code var html='<div class=somediv></div>'; var target=document.getElementById('contentArea'); target.appendChild(html); I'm getting Uncaught Error: NOT_FOUND_ERR:
Using This code: I am tring to fill the page with the data and
Im using this code: protected String getContactInfo() { Cursor cursor = getContentResolver().query(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI, null, null,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.