Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 209347
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T17:54:26+00:00 2026-05-11T17:54:26+00:00

If I do not care about a thrown Exception. Can I code in a

  • 0

If I do not care about a thrown Exception. Can I code in a way as not to create it?

In other words, can an Exception be thrown but no Exception object be created?

An example – Simple example using a System.Net.Sockets.Socket

 Socket acceptingSocket;
acceptingSocket.Blocking = false;

while(condition)
{
    try
    {
        Socket acceptedSocket = acceptingSocket.Accept(); //(i)
        doWork(acceptedSocket);
    }
    catch{}
}

because the socket is in non-blocking mode
if there is no connection to accept
a SocketException is thrown at point (i)
and the conditional loop continues.

using this code implementation – will the SocketException object be created?

AND if it is created – is there a way to NOT create it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T17:54:27+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 5:54 pm

    You can’t suppress exceptions, you can only ignore them. In any case, it’s not the creating of the Exception object that’s expensive — it’s the stack walk that happens when the exception is thrown.

    Also,

    catch(SocketException) {}
    

    not

    catch { } or catch(Exception) { }
    

    🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 116k
  • Answers 116k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The use of function scope variables and closures to simulate… May 11, 2026 at 10:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Hm, I can't think of a way to use PHP's… May 11, 2026 at 10:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer So, write your own, at least for these stored procedures.… May 11, 2026 at 10:37 pm

Related Questions

I'm stuck deciding how to handle exceptions in my application. Much if my issues
Ok, I have a strange exception thrown from my code that's been bothering me
When writing async method implementations using the BeginInvoke/EndInvoke pattern the code might look something
I have a question about boost::shared_ptr<T> . There are lots of thread. using namespace

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.